Trade for your account.
MAM | PAMM | POA.
Forex prop firm | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).
*No teaching *No selling courses *No discussion *If yes, no reply!
Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management
In the two-way trading field of foreign exchange investment, there is a profound internal driving relationship between the grand dream of "making big money" and the "boring and repetitive" trading practice - for foreign exchange traders who harbor this dream, it is this strong desire for long-term profits that prompts them to actively endure and persist in those seemingly monotonous trading links that require continuous repetition.
Foreign exchange trading is not a speculative behavior that relies on short-term luck, but a process that requires regular operations, repeated reviews, and continuous verification of strategies to accumulate competitive advantages. From the daily combing and analysis of currency pair market data, to the detailed review of each transaction log, to the repeated polishing of core technologies such as moving average trend judgment and candle chart pattern recognition, these links often lack immediate interest and are even extremely repetitive and boring. But for traders with the core goal of "making big money", this dream has become a key motivation to overcome boredom and persist in repetition, allowing them to transform short-term monotonous efforts into the potential for long-term profits, gradually improve the trading system and improve their ability to judge the market through repetition day after day.
Judging from the wider experience of traditional social life, it is not uncommon for "people to focus on repetition due to external constraints or internal goals, and ultimately achieve breakthroughs in the field." Among them, "the prison environment prompts Taiwanese scholars to delve deeper into the field of history" is a typical case. According to records, two scholars in Taiwan were imprisoned. Due to prison management regulations, the only books they had access to were historical works, and other types of books were prohibited from reading. During their long and relatively closed prison life, in order to pass the boring time and seek spiritual sustenance under limited conditions, they began to devote all their energy to the reading and research of history books - from systematically sorting out major events in different historical periods, to in-depth analysis of the behavioral logic and influence of historical figures, to summarizing and refining the internal laws of historical development. This single and repetitive learning process, although lacking the stimulation of fresh information from the outside world, allowed them to accumulate knowledge reserves and research depth in the field of history that far exceeded ordinary people. In the end, it was this repeated study experience under "restriction" that allowed them to form a unique research perspective and profound academic attainments in the field of historical scholarship, and became influential professional scholars in this field. This case fully illustrates that whether it is passive constraints formed by the external environment or active choices driven by internal goals, when individuals enter a state of "focus and repetition", they can often achieve rapid accumulation of knowledge and abilities in specific fields, thereby breaking through bottlenecks and achieving goals.
Returning to the two-way trading scenario of foreign exchange investment, this logic of "driving repetition to achieve goals" also applies. From the perspective of human nature, almost no foreign exchange trader will actively prefer the "simple repetition, boring repetition, infinite repetition" trading process - repeated review of the same type of market trends can easily cause psychological burnout, repeated verification of the same trading strategy may make people feel boring, and continued compliance with the same set of trading disciplines is a great test of patience and willpower. But when traders set up a grand dream of "making big money" in their hearts, this dream will be transformed into a powerful "internal binding force", forcing them to stop pursuing "fun" and instead focus on the accumulation of "effectiveness". For example, in order to accurately grasp the effectiveness of moving average cross signals in different markets, they will repeatedly review the historical trends of mainstream currency pairs in the past few years, record the price fluctuation results corresponding to each cross signal, and summarize the core conditions for the validity and invalidity of signals; in order to avoid being misled by the short-term fluctuations of candle charts, they will repeatedly compare the relationship between a single candle chart pattern and the mid- and long-term trends, and refine judgment standards that conform to their own trading logic. This seemingly boring repetition is essentially accumulating "quantitative changes" for the optimization of trading strategies and the deepening of trading cognition. When the "quantitative changes" reach a certain level, it will naturally trigger "qualitative changes" - traders will judge market trends more accurately, be more able to deal with risks, and eventually move closer to the dream of "making big money". It can be said that in foreign exchange trading, the "dream of making big money" is the core engine that makes traders willing to endure boredom and insist on repetition, and "boring repetition" is the only way to transform dreams into real profits.
In the two-way trading field of foreign exchange investment, a common phenomenon is that successful foreign exchange traders often do not take the initiative to share their investment and trading methods, strategies or systems.
But what needs to be made clear is that this "not sharing" does not stem from the trader's stinginess or stinginess, but is based on a deep understanding of the complexity of the market and individual differences among traders. It is essentially a rational choice to "avoid harming others". Successful traders know very well that foreign exchange trading is not a simple "method copying" game. A set of strategies that have been proven effective in their own practice, if divorced from the adapted scenarios and user characteristics, is very likely to become an inducement for others to lose money. They are unwilling to blindly share, causing other traders to misuse strategies without judgment of suitability, and ultimately suffer unnecessary losses. Behind this "not sharing" is actually a respect for the laws of the market and a responsible attitude towards their peers.
In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, the effectiveness of trading strategies highly depends on the "fit between people and strategies", and each foreign exchange trader has significant differences in core dimensions, which makes "different results with the same strategy" a common phenomenon. From the perspective of capital scale, some traders have sufficient principal to support long-term light position layout, while others have small capital and need to rely on short-term fluctuations to make profits. The difference in capital amount directly determines the risk tolerance boundary of the strategy; from the perspective of trading habits, some traders are good at long-term operations that wait patiently for the trend to take shape. , some prefer short-term trading that captures short-term price differences. The difference in habits will affect the control of the rhythm of the strategy; from the perspective of execution, mature traders can strictly abide by the stop-loss and take-profit rules, while novices often change strategies without authorization due to emotional interference. The difference in execution will directly lead to deviations in the implementation of the strategy. Because of these individual differences, even a high-quality system that has been proven by the market may produce very different results in the hands of different traders - a strategy that is effective for successful traders may become a "trap" that leads to continued losses for other traders due to insufficient funds, inconsistent habits, or lack of execution. Therefore, successful traders choose not to share casually, essentially to avoid risks to others due to "strategy mismatch" and to prevent the situation of "good intentions leading to bad consequences".
Further looking at the adaptation scenarios of the strategy itself, in two-way transactions of foreign exchange investment, there are essential differences in the strategy logic corresponding to different fund sizes and trading modes. Applying strategies randomly across scenarios can easily lead to major risks. Take the short-term long-term strategy commonly used by large funds as an example. Its core logic is to rely on the long-term trend to accumulate profits, and reduce the impact of short-term fluctuations on the account through the combination of large amounts of funds and low positions. Even in some cases, because the long-term trend is highly certain and the floating loss space is controllable, strict stop loss can not be set temporarily and rely on time to digest short-term retracement. However, this strategy cannot be applied to short-term heavy position trading at all - short-term trading relies on short-term price fluctuations, and the holding time is extremely short, and heavy positioning operations will amplify the risk of each reverse price movement. If the logic of "no stop loss" is applied to long-term short-term positions at this time, once the market experiences short-term fluctuations that exceed expectations, the account is very likely to hit the liquidation threshold in a short period of time, resulting in a total loss of principal. The strong adaptability of this strategy scenario determines that even if successful traders share their own strategies, if the user fails to clearly understand the applicable boundaries of the strategy and blindly applies the long-term method of large funds and light positions to short-term heavy position transactions, he will still face extremely high risks of liquidation. It is precisely out of vigilance against the risk of cross-scenario application that successful traders choose not to share strategies at will to avoid irreparable losses caused by cognitive biases to others.
In two-way trading in foreign exchange investment, the trader's mindset plays a crucial role in profitability and success.
When traders abandon the short-sighted thinking of "make a little money and run" and instead adopt a more stable and long-term investment strategy, they can often achieve profits and success. However, for the vast majority of small-capital retail investors in the foreign exchange investment market, this is not the case.
These small-capital retail investors often have limited funds, and the scarcity of funds shapes their way of thinking to a large extent. They often fall into a "lack of money thinking", which is essentially a poverty thinking pattern, which has deeply penetrated into their concepts. This mode of thinking causes them to be overly cautious in trading and eager to close their positions once they make a small profit, for fear of losing the gains they have made. This fear of gain and loss is a great pain to them, even more painful than simple loss.
Therefore, although these small-capital retail investors may have correctly judged the general direction of the market, they were unable to fully enjoy the huge profits brought by the general trend due to premature closing of positions. In fact, the vast majority of small-capital retail investors are short-term traders. They frequently conduct short-term transactions in an attempt to obtain profits in a short period of time. However, the cruel truth about foreign exchange investment and trading is that short-term traders often have difficulty achieving profits, let alone achieving financial freedom or wealth freedom in this way.
In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, successful foreign exchange investment traders often show excellent abilities to handle and respond to floating losses.
This ability is not innate but is developed through long-term practice and experience accumulation. For foreign exchange investment and trading novices, they usually have an idealized concept that the return on investment and trading positions should always remain positive. In their view, once a negative number appears, measures should be taken immediately to cut off losses, and only allow the gains and profits of positive positions to continue to accumulate and grow. This view is theoretically reasonable, but in actual transactions it is often difficult to realize.
However, real trading situations differ significantly from this idealized notion of a novice trader. In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, a series of newly opened positions will often show a series of negative performance before they are stable. This is because in market fluctuations, short-term price fluctuations are difficult to fully align with long-term trends. Even if the trader accurately determines the general trend and direction, when the trend retracement occurs, the newly created position may still show up as a series of negative numbers. This phenomenon is extremely common in the foreign exchange market and reflects the complexity and uncertainty of the market.
However, large, sophisticated and successful investors have a completely different view. They are not afraid of trend retracement, nor are they afraid of the retracement of the yield curve, nor will they panic due to a series of negative numbers. To them, these retracements are healthy and a normal manifestation of market volatility. They know very well that in foreign exchange investment, short-term floating losses do not mean ultimate failure. On the contrary, these short-term fluctuations are often opportunities given to investors by the market. As long as they can be correctly identified and responded to, they may be converted into long-term profits. Therefore, they focus more on evaluating the benefits and risks of trading from an overall and long-term perspective, rather than being swayed by short-term fluctuations.
In the two-way trading field of foreign exchange investment, small-capital short-term traders are always faced with a dilemma that is difficult to break through: if they choose long-term investment with light positions, the long holding period will test their patience, and it is difficult for most people to persist; if they turn to short-term trading with heavy positions, although they can meet the demand for short-term profits, it will be difficult to achieve long-term survival due to too high risks.
This contradiction does not stem from the traders' lack of ability, but the natural conflict between the small capital scale and the profit logic of the foreign exchange market - the small capital group's demand for "quick improvement in returns" is inherently inconsistent with the profit nature of the foreign exchange market of "long-term compound interest and controllable risks", ultimately leading to them falling into a dilemma.
In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, small-capital short-term traders account for a very high proportion of market participants and can be called a "concentrated tribe." Limited by the limited capital scale, they generally have an eager mentality of "making quick money and making big money" - hoping to quickly enlarge the amount of capital through short-term high-frequency trading and get rid of the current situation of capital shortage. This mentality directly drives their tendency to choose the short-term trading mode with heavy positions. However, the short-term trend of the foreign exchange market is affected by multiple random factors such as instantaneous capital flows, sudden news shocks, and market sentiment fluctuations, showing a high degree of randomness, chaos, and irregularity. There is almost no short-term profit logic that can be stably replicated. In essence, short-term trading with heavy positions is closer to "risk-taking activities" than investment behavior based on rational analysis. In order to control risks, such traders usually set stop losses for positions. However, due to the randomness of short-term trends, in most cases, price fluctuations will frequently trigger the stop loss line, resulting in "small stop loss accumulation", which will still erode the principal in the long run; if they choose to "carry orders" to avoid stop losses, they may be able to lose money due to the market situation in the short term. A profit can be achieved through a correction, but once the trend reverses or extreme market conditions occur, the loss of a single heavy position may cover the previous small profits, or even exhaust the principal. In extreme cases, the net value of the account may touch the liquidation line and be forced to leave the market, and eventually exit the foreign exchange market forever, completely losing the chance of a comeback.
If small-capital short-term traders give up heavy short-term positions and choose light long-term investments, new dilemmas will arise: The first is the test of time cost-light long-term investments rely on medium and long-term trends to accumulate profits, and the holding period often lasts for months or even years. This puts extremely high demands on the patience and determination of traders, and most are accustomed to short-term investment. The small-capital group operating the operation cannot tolerate the long waiting process and is prone to closing positions in advance before the trend is fully developed, thus missing profit opportunities; secondly, there is the limitation of profit scale - even if some traders can adhere to the long-term strategy of short positions and achieve stable profits, the limited capital scale makes it difficult for profits to substantially improve their lives. As a result, this "stable profit" lacks practical implementation significance. Taking the common long-term profit level of light positions as an example, if the initial capital is US$10,000, even if a stable annualized rate of return of 10% is achieved (this level is already a high-quality performance in the foreign exchange market), the annual profit will be only US$1,000. This amount is not only difficult to cover the annual living expenses of a single person, but also cannot support the economic needs at the family level, and cannot fundamentally solve the economic plight of small capital groups. What is even more paradoxical is that if this type of short-term long-term strategy is applied to large capital entities such as funds, investment banks, and institutions, it can become an excellent asset allocation solution due to its low risk and stable income characteristics. Large capital scale can convert a 10% annualized rate of return into considerable absolute returns to meet the profit goals of institutions. However, for small capital traders, the same strategy has become an ineffective solution that "cannot solve basic life problems" due to the small capital base.
It is this "dilemma" reality that constitutes the core dilemma of small-capital short-term traders: although long-term investment with light positions has controllable risks, it is unattractive because it is too long to persist and has limited returns to improve life; although short-term trading with heavy positions can meet the demand of "short-term profits and change the status quo", it is difficult to maintain long-term because the risks are too high, and may even lead to the loss of principal. Under this contradiction, some small-capital traders will fall into the struggle between "rationality and gambling", and finally tend to choose heavy gambling trading - they are well aware of the high risks of this model, but believe that "even if it is difficult to last, if they can succeed once, at least they can change their life embarrassment in the short term." This kind of luck mentality of "using small to gain big" is essentially a helpless compromise to the real predicament, but it also further intensifies the risk of survival in the foreign exchange market.
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
z.x.n@139.com
Mr. Z-X-N
China · Guangzhou